Please see below the full text of Pope Francisâ€™ 2018 message which was published on 24 January, the feast day of Saint Francis de Sales (1567 â€“ 1622), bishop of Geneva and founder of the Visitation Sisters.Â Saint Francis de Sales is the patron saint of writers, editors and journalists.
Message of Pope Francis for the 52nd World Day of Social Communications. This year, the day will be celebrated in many countries on Sunday May 13, Solemnity of the Ascension of the Lord.
â€œThe truth will set you freeâ€ (Jn 8:32).
Fake news and journalism for peace
Dear Brothers and Sisters,
Communication is part of Godâ€™s plan for us and an essential way to experience fellowship. Â Made in the image and likeness of our Creator, we are able to express and share all that is true, good, and beautiful. We are able to describe our own experiences and the world around us, and thus to create historical memory and the understanding of events. But when we yield to our own pride and selfishness, we can also distort the way we use our ability to communicate. This can be seen from the earliest times, in the biblical stories of Cain and Abel and the Tower of Babel (cf. Gen 4:4-16; 11:1-9). The capacity to twist the truth is symptomatic of our condition, both as individuals and communities. On the other hand, when we are faithful to Godâ€™s plan, communication becomes an effective expression of our responsible search for truth and our pursuit of goodness.
In todayâ€™s fast-changing world of communications and digital systems, we are witnessing the spread of what has come to be known as â€œfake newsâ€. This calls for reflection, which is why I have decided to return in this World Communications Day Message to the issue of truth, which was raised time and time again by my predecessors, beginning with Pope Paul VI, whose 1972 Message took as its theme: â€œSocial Communications at the Service of Truthâ€. In this way, I would like to contribute to our shared commitment to stemming the spread of fake news and to rediscovering the dignity of journalism and the personal responsibility of journalists to communicate the truth.
1 . What is â€œfakeâ€ about fake news?â€¨
The term â€œfake newsâ€ has been the object of great discussion and debate. In general, it refers to the spreading of disinformation on line or in the traditional media. It has to do with false information based on non-existent or distorted data meant to deceive and manipulate the reader. Spreading fake news can serve to advance specific goals, influence political decisions, and serve economic interests.
The effectiveness of fake news is primarily due to its ability to mimic real news, to seem plausible. Secondly, this false but believable news is â€œcaptiousâ€, inasmuch as it grasps peopleâ€™s attention by appealing to stereotypes and common social prejudices, and exploiting instantaneous emotions like anxiety, contempt, anger and frustration. The ability to spread such fake news often relies on a manipulative use of the social networks and the way they function. Untrue stories can spread so quickly that even authoritative denials fail to contain the damage.
The difficulty of unmasking and eliminating fake news is due also to the fact that many people interact in homogeneous digital environments impervious to differing perspectives and opinions. Disinformation thus thrives on the absence of healthy confrontation with other sources of information that could effectively challenge prejudices and generate constructive dialogue; instead, it risks turning people into unwilling accomplices in spreading biased and baseless ideas. The tragedy of disinformation is that it discredits others, presenting them as enemies, to the point of demonizing them and fomenting conflict. Fake news is a sign of intolerant and hypersensitive attitudes, and leads only to the spread of arrogance and hatred. That is the end result of untruth.
- How can we recognize fake news?â€¨
None of us can feel exempted from the duty of countering these falsehoods. This is no easy task, since disinformation is often based on deliberately evasive and subtly misleading rhetoric and at times the use of sophisticated psychological mechanisms. Praiseworthy efforts are being made to create educational programmes aimed at helping people to interpret and assess information provided by the media, and teaching them to take an active part in unmasking falsehoods, rather than unwittingly contributing to the spread of disinformation. Praiseworthy too are those institutional and legal initiatives aimed at developing regulations for curbing the phenomenon, to say nothing of the work being done by tech and media companies in coming up with new criteria for verifying the personal identities concealed behind millions of digital profiles.
Yet preventing and identifying the way disinformation works also calls for a profound and careful process of discernment. We need to unmask what could be called the â€œsnake-tacticsâ€ used by those who disguise themselves in order to strike at any time and place. This was the strategy employed by the â€œcrafty serpentâ€ in the Book of Genesis, who, at the dawn of humanity, created the first fake news (cf. Gen 3:1-15), which began the tragic history of human sin, beginning with the first fratricide (cf. Gen 4) and issuing in the countless other evils committed against God, neighbour, society and creation. The strategy of this skilled â€œFather of Liesâ€ (Jn 8:44) is precisely mimicry, that sly and dangerous form of seduction that worms its way into the heart with false and alluring arguments.
In the account of the first sin, the tempter approaches the woman by pretending to be her friend, concerned only for her welfare, and begins by saying something only partly true: â€œDid God really say you were not to eat from any of the trees in the garden?â€ (Gen 3:1). In fact, God never told Adam not to eat from any tree, but only from the one tree: â€œOf the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you are not to eatâ€ (Gen 2:17). The woman corrects the serpent, but lets herself be taken in by his provocation: â€œOf the fruit of the tree in the middle of the garden God said, â€œYou must not eat it nor touch it, under pain of deathâ€ (Gen 3:2). Her answer is couched in legalistic and negative terms; after listening to the deceiver and letting herself be taken in by his version of the facts, the woman is misled. So she heeds his words of reassurance: â€œYou will not die!â€ (Gen 3:4).
The tempterâ€™s â€œdeconstructionâ€ then takes on an appearance of truth: â€œGod knows that on the day you eat it your eyes will be opened and you will be like gods, knowing good and evilâ€ (Gen 3:5). Godâ€™s paternal command, meant for their good, is discredited by the seductive enticement of the enemy: â€œThe woman saw that the tree was good to eat and pleasing to the eye and desirableâ€ (Gen 3:6). This biblical episode brings to light an essential element for our reflection: there is no such thing as harmless disinformation; on the contrary, trusting in falsehood can have dire consequences. Even a seemingly slight distortion of the truth can have dangerous effects.
What is at stake is our greed. Fake news often goes viral, spreading so fast that it is hard to stop, not because of the sense of sharing that inspires the social media, but because it appeals to the insatiable greed so easily aroused in human beings. The economic and manipulative aims that feed disinformation are rooted in a thirst for power, a desire to possess and enjoy, which ultimately makes us victims of something much more tragic: the deceptive power of evil that moves from one lie to another in order to rob us of our interior freedom. That is why education for truth means teaching people how to discern, evaluate and understand our deepest desires and inclinations, lest we lose sight of what is good and yield to every temptation.
- â€œThe truth will set you freeâ€ (Jn 8:32)â€¨
Constant contamination by deceptive language can end up darkening our interior life. Dostoevskyâ€™s observation is illuminating: â€œPeople who lie to themselves and listen to their own lie come to such a pass that they cannot distinguish the truth within them, or around them, and so lose all respect for themselves and for others. And having no respect, they cease to love, and in order to occupy and distract themselves without love they give way to passions and to coarse pleasures, and sink to bestiality in their vices, all from continual lying to others and to themselves.â€ (The Brothers Karamazov, II, 2).
So how do we defend ourselves? The most radical antidote to the virus of falsehood is purification by the truth. In Christianity, truth is not just a conceptual reality that regards how we judge things, defining them as true or false. The truth is not just bringing to light things that are concealed, â€œrevealing realityâ€, as the ancient Greek term aletheia (from a-lethÃ¨s, â€œnot hiddenâ€) might lead us to believe. Truth involves our whole life. In the Bible, it carries with it the sense of support, solidity, and trust, as implied by the root â€˜aman, the source of our liturgical expression Amen. Truth is something you can lean on, so as not to fall. In this relational sense, the only truly reliable and trustworthy One â€“ the One on whom we can count â€“ is the living God. Hence, Jesus can say: â€œI am the truthâ€ (Jn 14:6). We discover and rediscover the truth when we experience it within ourselves in the loyalty and trustworthiness of the One who loves us. This alone can liberate us: â€œThe truth will set you freeâ€ (Jn 8:32).
Freedom from falsehood and the search for relationship: these two ingredients cannot be lacking if our words and gestures are to be true, authentic, and trustworthy. To discern the truth, we need to discern everything that encourages communion and promotes goodness from whatever instead tends to isolate, divide, and oppose. Truth, therefore, is not really grasped when it is imposed from without as something impersonal, but only when it flows from free relationships between persons, from listening to one another. Nor can we ever stop seeking the truth, because falsehood can always creep in, even when we state things that are true. An impeccable argument can indeed rest on undeniable facts, but if it is used to hurt another and to discredit that person in the eyes of others, however correct it may appear, it is not truthful. We can recognize the truth of statements from their fruits: whether they provoke quarrels, foment division, encourage resignation; or, on the other hand, they promote informed and mature reflection leading to constructive dialogue and fruitful results.
- Peace is the true news
The best antidotes to falsehoods are not strategies, but people: people who are not greedy but ready to listen, people who make the effort to engage in sincere dialogue so that the truth can emerge; people who are attracted by goodness and take responsibility for how they use language. If responsibility is the answer to the spread of fake news, then a weighty responsibility rests on the shoulders of those whose job is to provide information, namely, journalists, the protectors of news.
In todayâ€™s world, theirs is, in every sense, not just a job; it is a mission. Amid feeding frenzies and the mad rush for a scoop, they must remember that the heart of information is not the speed with which it is reported or its audience impact, but persons. Informing others means forming others; it means being in touch with peopleâ€™s lives. That is why ensuring the accuracy of sources and protecting communication are real means of promoting goodness, generating trust, and opening the way to communion and peace.
I would like, then, to invite everyone to promote a journalism of peace. By that, I do not mean the saccharine kind of journalism that refuses to acknowledge the existence of serious problems or smacks of sentimentalism. On the contrary, I mean a journalism that is truthful and opposed to falsehoods, rhetorical slogans, and sensational headlines. A journalism created by people for people, one that is at the service of all, especially those â€“ and they are the majority in our world â€“ who have no voice. A journalism less concentrated on breaking news than on exploring the underlying causes of conflicts, in order to promote deeper understanding and contribute to their resolution by setting in place virtuous processes. A journalism committed to pointing out alternatives to the escalation of shouting matches and verbal violence.
To this end, drawing inspiration from a Franciscan prayer, we might turn to the Truth in person:
Lord, make us instruments of your peace.â€¨
Help us to recognize the evil latent in a communication
that does not build communion.
Help us to remove the venom from our judgements.â€¨
Help us to speak about others as our brothers and sisters.â€¨
You are faithful and trustworthy;
may our words be seeds of goodness for the world:
Â where there is shouting, let us practice listening;â€¨
where there is confusion, let us inspire harmony;â€¨
where there is ambiguity, let us bring clarity;â€¨
where there is exclusion, let us offer solidarity;â€¨
where there is sensationalism, let us use sobriety;â€¨
where there is superficiality, let us raise real questions;â€¨
where there is prejudice, let us awaken trust;â€¨
where there is hostility, let us bring respect;â€¨
where there is falsehood, let us bring truth.â€¨Amen.
From the Vatican, 24 January 2018, the Memorial of Saint Francis de Sales.